Springfield, MO 417-222-4878
Joplin, MO 417-222-4878

Missouri House tries again to protect negligent doctors

The Missouri House of Representatives is trying to circumvent our state\’s
Supreme Court. Two days ago, the House backed a proposal to restore limits on
medical malpractice compensation for people who have been harmed by a negligent doctor or hospital.

The proposal would reinstate the $350,000 cap on noneconomic damages that
the court struck down as unconstitutional two years ago in a landmark ruling.

In a 4-3 decision, the court said the cap on noneconomic damages “violates
the constitutional right to trial by jury.” The court said the cap
restricted juries in their “fact-finding role.”

Some members of the Missouri House want to get around that ruling by declaring
that medical malpractice claims are not covered by common law extant at
the time the state Constitution was adopted in 1820. Malpractice claims
would, if the proposal is made into law, be covered by state law.

A similar proposal made its way through the House last year, only to die
in the Senate.

Proponents of the caps claim the malpractice compensation limits are needed
to keep insurance costs down for doctors and thereby prevent physicians
from fleeing the state.

An issue they inevitably gloss over is that malpractice caps harm only
those people who have already been seriously injured by a doctor or hospital
that made negligent surgical errors, medication errors, diagnostic errors
or other preventable mistakes.

Not all politicians are eager to see the state punish those victims. One
Lee’s Summit representative said it is “fat out immoral”
to place a cap on malpractice compensation. A Blue Springs representative
said she believes the proposal violates her belief “in the sanctity
of human life.”

She said that if the state restores the limits, “we’re saying
that a life is not worth more than $350,000 or $500,000 or whatever we

We will keep you updated in this space on this important issue.

Source: KMOV.com, \”Missouri House backs limits on medical malpractice,\”
David Lieb, Feb. 27, 2014

Wrongful Death

Honoring the memories of the loves of his life

The story in the Joplin Globe of a Pittsburg girl, her mother and her dad is enough to break your heart and at the same time reaffirm a belief in the goodness of most people. The girl was just 13 years old when she was killed with her mom in 2009 by a drunk driver in a car accident. The girl died at the scene of the crash; her mom

Birth Injuries

Family settles medical malpractice claim over boy\’s birth injury

He was born nearly three and a half years ago. Instead of anticipating the day their son begins kindergarten, his parents are planning for his lifetime of required care. At his birth, he suffered a \”catastrophic brain injury\” due to medical malpractice, according to the lawsuit the family filed far from us in Joplin. Media reports indicate the family recently settled their claims against a Honolulu military hospital for $9

Medical Malpractice

Malpractice liability for untimely death of terminal patient?

In any medical malpractice case, there are four general elements that must be proven. These are: duty; breach; causation; and harm. While public discussion of medical malpractice tends to focus a lot on the elements of duty and breach, causation is a very important aspect of any medical malpractice case. Proving that a physician breached a recognized standard of care and that the patient suffered harm is not enough in

Contact Us.

    Submitting the form is not necessarily establishing an attorney-client relationship