Springfield, MO 417-222-4878
Joplin, MO 417-222-4878

Appeal involves issue of noneconomic damages in wrongful death med mal cases

JVM Logo

Noneconomic damages can be a very important aspect of medical malpractice litigation, particularly in cases where economic damages are—for whatever reason—not adequate to justly compensate an injured patient. Unfortunately, some states put caps on noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases, including Missouri.

At present, there is a court challenge to a state law capping the amount of noneconomic damages plaintiffs may receive in medical malpractice cases. The 2005 law capped noneconomic damages is medical malpractice cases at $350,000, but the Missouri Supreme Court ruled in 2012 that caps on noneconomic damages were unconstitutional. That was a personal injury case, however, and the issue on appeal is whether the cap applies in medical malpractice cases involving allegations of wrongful death. 

The appeal is based on the 2011 death of a woman whose life ended after a St. Louis-area cardiologist performed a heart test which blocked blood flow to her heart. The jury in that case awarded $9 million in noneconomic damages, but the trial court reduced the award to $350,000 as per the 2005 cap. The reason for the court’s decision in that case was that limiting noneconomic caps in medical malpractice cases violated a plaintiff’s right to a jury trial.

The issue on appeal is specifically what lawmakers intended with the 2005 cap. On one side, the argument is that lawmakers intended to cap noneconomic damages in wrongful death cases, but not personal injury cases. On the other side, the argument is that lawmakers intended to cap noneconomic damages in all cases.

We’ll continue looking at this issue in our next post.  

Sources:

St. Louis Public Radio, “Missouri Supreme Court to decide whether wrongful death cases are subject to caps on damages,” Marshall Griffin, Oct. 21, 2015.

Daily Journal, “Family challenges state caps on damages in medical malpractice cases to Missouri Supreme Court,” Summer Ballentine Oct. 21, 2015.

Claims Journal, “Missouri Medical Malpractice Limits on Noneconomic Damages Challenged Again,” Summer Ballentine, Oct. 23, 2015. 

JVM Logo
Medical Malpractice

What is the importance of non-economic damages in med mal cases? P.2

In our previous post, we began speaking about non-economic damages in the context of medical malpractice litigation. Last time, we spoke about situations or reasons why noneconomic damages can be important in medical malpractice litigation: cases, for example, where the medical costs resulting from negligence are not particularly significant, and cases where the specific injury to the patient either is not intimately tied up with the patient’s ability to earn

JVM Logo
Articles

Missouri lawmakers attempt to resurrect malpractice cap

When you go to a physician, you expect that they will use their best efforts to treat your condition. Unfortunately, many physicians fall short of this standard and commit medical malpractice, which sometimes results in patient injuries (or death in some cases). When this happens, you would expect that the law would allow you to seek compensation for your injuries from the physician. However, if some Missouri lawmakers have their

JVM Logo
Firm News

Scott Vorhees to Appear on Four States Business Showcase

Attorney Scott Vorhees of Johnson, Vorhees & Martucci will be featured on an upcoming edition of Four States Business Showcase. Attorney Vorhees will discuss the widespread problem of medical errors in modern hospitals and how individuals who are injured by negligent medical personnel may have grounds to take legal action against the responsible parties. You can view it here. Preventable medical errors are responsible for the deaths of more than

Contact Us.

    Submitting the form is not necessarily establishing an attorney-client relationship