Springfield, MO 417-222-4878
Joplin, MO 417-222-4878

Proving Fault in a Car Accident Claim

JVM Logo

All automobile accident cases are centered on proving who is at fault.
Each driver involved in a car wreck is probably concerned about who is
at fault or liable for the wreck. The driver who is at fault will be responsible
for paying the harms and losses caused by that car wreck.

The truth about many accidents is that fault can be shared to some extent.
Sometimes one driver may be partly at fault for speeding while another
is partly at fault for pulling out in front of the other. The determination
of fault has a major impact on how the injury claims are settled for all
involved parties.

Determining liability can be a very difficult component of an accident
claim – especially if there are conflicting stories about what happened.
Many times, there will be a fight about who is at fault or who bears the
biggest portion of the blame for an accident. This is why having an experienced
car accident attorney is key to getting a fair settlement.

Determining Fault

The actions of all drivers are considered during this part of the case,
and even injured drivers may share partial fault in the final assessment.
Final assignment of a driver’s fault is given by a judge or jury
if the case goes to court, but many accident cases are settled long before
this step.

Remember that just because an injured person may be partly at fault for
a crash does not mean that he or she cannot make a claim and recover some
money. Cases that do not involve obvious fault are the ones that find
their way to the court, which will always require a personal injury attorney
with trial experience.

Understanding Comparative Negligence

Liability in an auto accident is impacted by the comparative negligence
law, which says all parties’ potential liability in a crash must
be evaluated. The percentage of liability assigned to each driver will
determine their responsibility for the other party’s injuries.

While passengers are typically able to get their entire damages considered,
drivers will have their total damages reduced by the amount of their comparative
negligence percentage. If a driver is partly at fault for the crash, then
that driver will have their award reduced by that percent of fault.

In pure comparative negligence states, only drivers who are 100% responsible
for an accident will not receive injury compensation. Most injured drivers
should receive some form of compensation.

In a modified comparative fault state, drivers who are over 50% at fault
will be denied a claim. It is important to hire an attorney who is experienced
and licensed in the state where the wreck happened.

Often establishing liability in a car accident is not an easy task. When
in doubt, always call an
experienced personal injury attorney. Even if you are not sure whether you have a claim or not, you can always
speak with the attorneys at Johnson Vorhees & Martucci. Our firm has
over 140 years of collective experience representing injury victims and
a proven track record of results for our clients.

Contact our firm at (833) 600-0125 for a no-fee, no-obligation consultation.

JVM Logo
Brain Injuries

Missouri child\’s brain injuries result in $5 million settlement

A Missouri mom and her three young children were taking a Saturday drive to the library when tragedy struck. As the woman slowed her car to a near stop to turn left into the library parking lot, it was slammed into at 60 mph by a pick-up truck. The violent collision left the woman’s child, just a year and a half old at the time, with traumatic brain injuries. His

JVM Logo
Medical Malpractice

Appeal involves issue of noneconomic damages in wrongful death med mal cases

Noneconomic damages can be a very important aspect of medical malpractice litigation, particularly in cases where economic damages are—for whatever reason—not adequate to justly compensate an injured patient. Unfortunately, some states put caps on noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases, including Missouri. At present, there is a court challenge to a state law capping the amount of noneconomic damages plaintiffs may receive in medical malpractice cases. The 2005 law capped

JVM Logo
Attorney Spotlight

Missouri Personal Injury Attorney Scott J. Vorhees: Top 10 Client Satisfaction

Congratulations to Attorney Scott J. Vorhees on receiving a “10 Best in Missouri for Client Satisfaction” award from the American Institute of Personal Injury Attorneys! Each year, the American Institute of Personal Injury Attorneys (AIOPIA) recognizes the top lawyers in each state for their excellence in providing service and support to injury victims. Attorneys can be nominated for “10 Best” award consideration by other lawyers and clients, or identified through

Contact Us.

    Submitting the form is not necessarily establishing an attorney-client relationship